Oral Contrast Agents For Small Bowel MRI: Comparison of Different Additives To Optimize Bowel Distension (Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag.)

w.ajaj's picture
Journal Title, Volume, Page: 
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 11 (2004)
Year of Publication: 
2004
Authors: 
W. Ajaj
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Current Affiliation: 
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
S. C. Goehde
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
R. Jeyrani
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
H. Schneemann
Institute of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
S. G. Ruehm
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
J. F. Debatin
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
T. Lauenstein
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Preferred Abstract (Original): 

The purpose of this study was to compare different osmotic carbohydrate solutions (2.5% mannitol, 2.5% / 2.0% / 1.5% sorbitol) for small bowel MR imaging regarding image quality and patient acceptance. 12 healthy volunteers underwent each four MR examination after ingesting 1500ml of the different contrast solutions. While best distension values were observed after both the administration of 2.5% mannitol and 2.0% sorbitol, the use of sorbitol led to less side-effects and should therefore be recommended for small bowel MR imaging.

AttachmentSize
Oral_Contrast_Agents_For_Small_Bowel_MRI_Comparison_of_Different_Additives_To_Optimize_Bowel_Distension_(Proc_Intl_Soc_Mag).pdf321.94 KB