Dark Lumen MR Colonography: Comparison Between Water And Air Enema

w.ajaj's picture
Journal Title, Volume, Page: 
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 11 (2003)
Year of Publication: 
2003
Authors: 
W. Ajaj
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 45122 Essen, NRW, Germany
Current Affiliation: 
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
T. Lauenstein
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 45122 Essen, NRW, Germany
N. Papanikolaou
Department of Radiology, Crete, Crete, Germany
S. G. Ruehm
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 45122 Essen, NRW, Germany
J. F. Debatin
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 45122 Essen, NRW, Germany
Preferred Abstract (Original): 

Water used to distend the colon for MR-Colonography harbours the risk of spillage and may be associated with more discomfort than air or CO2. Using a short TE-sequence to mitigate susceptibility effects, five volunteers and five patients underwent air-distended MR colonography. The volunteers were examined a second time using water for colonic distension. Following intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast image quality was sufficient with both techniques to assess the enhancing colonic wall and detect colorectal masses. Colonic wall enhancement was superior with water distension however (p<0.05). Discomfort levels for air and water were not different

AttachmentSize
Dark_Lumen_MR_Colonography_Comparison_Between_Water_And_Air_Enema.pdf353.91 KB