Artificial Neural Networks in the Optimization of aNimodipine Controlled Release Tablet Formulation

7413's picture
Journal Title, Volume, Page: 
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 316–323
Year of Publication: 
2010
Authors: 
Feras Imad Kanaze
Pharmathen S.A., Pharmaceutical Industry, Athens, Greece
Current Affiliation: 
Department of Pharmacy,Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
Panagiotis Barmpalexis
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Kyriakos Kachrimanis
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Emanouil Georgarakis
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Preferred Abstract (Original): 

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were employed in the optimization of a nimodipine zero-order release matrix tablet formulation, and their efficiency was compared to that of multiple linear regression (MLR) on an external validation set. The amounts of PEG-4000, PVP K30, HPMC K100 and HPMC E50LV were used as independent variables following a statistical experimental design, and three dissolution parameters (time at which the 90% of the drug was dissolved, t90%, percentage of nimodipine released in 2 and 8 h, Y2h, and Y8h, respectively) were chosen as response variables. It was found that a feed-forward back-propagation ANN with eight hidden units showed better fit for all responses (R2 of 0.96, 0.90 and 0.98 for t90%Y2h and Y8h, respectively) compared to the MLR models (0.92, 0.87 and 0.92 for t90%Y2h and Y8h, respectively). The ANN was further simplified by pruning, which preserved only PEG-4000 and HPMC K100 as inputs. Optimal formulations based on ANN and MLR predictions were identified by minimizing the standardized Euclidian distance between measured and theoretical (zero order) release parameters. The estimation of the similarity factor, f2, confirmed ANNs increased prediction efficiency (81.98 and 79.46 for the original and pruned ANN, respectively, and 76.25 for the MLR).